Michael McClain, a former Illinois state lawmaker and ComEd lobbyist, has requested a separate trial from former Illinois House Speaker Michael Madigan. McClain believes that being tried together will prevent him from getting a fair trial because Madigan’s defense team plans to place the blame on him.
McClain’s attorney, Patrick Cotter, filed a motion with Judge John Blakey, stating that a joint trial would prejudice McClain’s case and deny him due process. The motion emphasized that McClain’s and Madigan’s defense strategies are incompatible, and if tried together, the jury might be forced to choose between their defenses instead of objectively determining the government’s case.
McClain’s motion highlighted the significant danger of this scenario, which would unfairly compromise his right to a fair trial. Cotter argued that this issue could be avoided by granting McClain a separate trial.
Michael Madigan, a prominent figure in Illinois politics, served in the Illinois House from 1971 to 2021 and was the speaker for many years. He faces 23 counts of racketeering, bribery, and official misconduct. Madigan has pleaded not guilty to these charges.
Madigan and McClain were initially charged together in March 2022 with 22 counts of racketeering and bribery related to dealings with ComEd, Illinois’ largest utility. The charges include allegations that Madigan used his political power to benefit his private law firm. In October 2022, prosecutors added more charges, including conspiracy related to a corruption scheme involving AT&T Illinois.
Also Read:
- How a Trump Presidency Could Benefit Millionaires: 5 Key Economic Impacts
- Woman Convicted of Landlord’s Murder Wins $3 Million Lawsuit Against CTA During Pending Criminal Case
The case against Madigan and McClain has garnered significant attention due to Madigan’s long-standing influence in Illinois politics. The outcome of the trials could have widespread implications for political and legal practices in the state.
