Readers respond: Articles’ language diminishes school funding’s importance

The urgent issues facing Oregon’s schools were highlighted in two recent articles by Julia Silverman of The Oregonian/OregonLive (Data show that public school students are struggling, but a new poll suggests Oregon voters aren’t terribly concerned, Oct. 8; Gov. Tina Kotek taps new education adviser as school advocates forecast pivotal legislative session, Nov. 14). These papers accurately depict challenges including persistent absenteeism and post-pandemic learning loss. However, the narrative’s assertion that school spending accounts for around one-third of the state budget downplays the significance of school funding and calls for reconsideration. For comparison, when all financing sources are taken into account, the portion of the state budget allocated to education, including higher education, is less than 18%.

More significantly, money for education is an investment in Oregon’s future rather than a financial burden, as the word consume implies. An important investment in our children, communities, and state economy is reflected in the state’s funding of K–12 education.

Note: Every piece of content is rigorously reviewed by our team of experienced writers and editors to ensure its accuracy. Our writers use credible sources and adhere to strict fact-checking protocols to verify all claims and data before publication. If an error is identified, we promptly correct it and strive for transparency in all updates, feel free to reach out to us via email. We appreciate your trust and support!

See also  Liz Weston: My husband got deported. How should I fill out my tax forms?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *