An Oregon guy has been out of jail for over a year after his case was unsuccessful. He was accused of repeatedly raping and molestation of a minor. If convicted, he faces a minimum sentence of 25 years in jail; however, he must first be given a public defender, and due to a persistent scarcity, neither the state nor the court have found one.
The same is true for two dozen other defendants from Oregon who are charged with conspiring to sell a huge drug cache that contained nine pounds of fentanyl, which is enough to make 144,000 lethal doses. The system still hasn’t been able to locate public defenders for ten of those individuals, and their case files are collecting dust more than a year after they were detained and accused.
Prosecutors throughout the state are continuing their urgent call for assistance to address a public defender shortage that is still spiraling out of control, Amanda Dalton, a lobbyist for the Oregon District Attorneys Association, told a subcommittee of state lawmakers Monday about these cases and others.
While the number of criminal defendants held in jail without attorneys has decreased by roughly half since mid-2023, to about 150 this week, the number of out-of-custody criminal defendants without attorneys has increased by more than 1,500, to about 3,500 this week, the district attorneys’ plea came as Nancy Cozine, the state’s top court administrator, told lawmakers the shortage has reached unprecedented heights.
In the end, Cozine stated, the problem has escalated to an unprecedented level.
Eighteen months after many Oregonians thought the issue had been resolved, the catastrophic situation has arisen. A more than $90 million plan to hire additional defense laywers was approved by the Oregon Legislature. House leaders said that day that they had met their pledge to solve the state’s deficit of public defenders.
However, state authorities moved slowly to establish special state strike teams of knowledgeable defense attorneys who may intervene to support cases like the one in which the suspected child rapist is involved, according to Rep. Paul Evans, D-Monmouth, who spoke to The Oregonian/OregonLive. Evans stated that he supports the $90 million plan but criticizes the Oregon Public Defense Commission’s leaders for not utilizing all of the resources provided by the Legislature.
Evans expressed his disappointment and anger at the fact that some of these technologies have not been utilized to their full potential. He notably mentioned how long it took the commission to hire the strike team of 20 state public defenders, which was around a year.
But according to the commission’s officials, it takes time to reconstruct a system that has been broken for decades and is incredibly complex. In late 2022, the commission hired a new executive director following years of unrest, which included firing its previous leader.
Jennifer Nash, the chair of the Public Defense Commission, stated in an email that the commission has made significant progress. To fix the system, we have the right people in place. Jessica Kampfe, the agency’s executive director, has been the most qualified individual to turn this organization around. She possesses the appropriate disposition, background, and abilities. She has done an amazing job creating this plane while flying it.
Evans said he stands by his remarks and is a non-voting member of the commission. I’m over making excuses now. I’m over making excuses.
Evans and several district attorneys told The Oregonian/OregonLive that they were encouraged by the Oregon Secretary of State’s Office’s announcement this week that it will conduct an audit of the Oregon Public Defense Commission’s and other state agencies’ performance during the audit period starting in July.
“The audits included in this plan target some of the areas of highest risk to taxpayers and the public,” stated Secretary of State Tobias Read in a news release, adding that audits assist foster a relationship of trust between Oregonians and their government.
The public defense commission’s executive director, Kampfe, stated that the increased scrutiny is not unexpected.
Kampfe stated in a statement that the Secretary of State informed them in 2023 that they intended to audit our agency in 2025. We are excited about the chance to collaborate with them on the audit.
Oregonians are at serious risk due to the public defender shortage, according to prosecutors, court officials, and public defenders:
Prosecutors claim that when cases go on, criminals are let out of jail, and occasionally, particularly in Multnomah County, charges are dropped, endangering the safety of victims and the community. They further claim that defendants occasionally conduct new, more serious crimes.
Court authorities also claim that the never-ending cycle is a financial waste because it takes an average of 110 days for defendants who are charged with crimes but are not detained to be given a public attorney. They make an average of five court appearances in the interim.
Jessica Roeser of the Oregon Judicial Department told lawmakers that the system wastes a lot of productivity because of these repeated appearances when people are not represented. The cases must be scheduled by the courts. Individuals must attend court appearances, pay for parking, and arrange for transportation. Orders and forms are being prepared by court employees. The hearings are being recorded. All of this just to be denied because we don’t have a lawyer on hand.
Public defenders claim that the state is failing to uphold its constitutional duty to promptly and adequately represent defendants who cannot afford legal representation, which accounts for almost 85% of all defendants prosecuted.
Additionally, according to public defenders, a federal judge didn’t address another injustice until the fall of 2023 when he ordered that recent arrestees be detained for no more than seven days without a court-appointed attorney. Even after being released from prison, the burden of criminal charges can damage a person’s reputation, cause them to miss work or family time, and generally cause disruptions in their lives, according to public defenders.
State court authorities informed lawmakers during this week’s congressional meeting that the majority of defendants who are not awarded court-appointed attorneys are those accused of driving while intoxicated. Defendants accused of shoplifting or stealing less than $1,000 worth of property come next, followed by those accused of auto theft.
Dalton, however, at the Association of District Attorneys, cited more extreme instances. Among them is a lady from Coos County who is charged with carelessly killing her 3-month-old child after he overdosed on methamphetamine. It took over a year after her release from prison for her to be given a public defender last month. According to Dalton, the defendant had already given birth to a new child by that point.
District attorneys in the Portland region have also provided notable examples. A guy who reportedly killed someone in Washington County by swerving into oncoming traffic on Oregon 47 while intoxicated was released from prison and went nine months without being assigned a public defender. He has had an arrest warrant out for him for the majority of the last year after skipping his next two court appearances.
“It’s astounding that Oregon has been unable to resolve this issue for a number of years,” said Kevin Barton, the district attorney for Washington County.
According to Barton, the Oregon Public Defense Commission is ultimately failing to fulfill its duties. This state agency is in charge of ensuring the effectiveness of Oregon’s indigent defense system. It’s not as if funds are in limited supply.
During his first month in office in January, Nathan Vasquez, the recently elected district attorney for Multnomah County, infuriated the county’s public defenders. He referred to the scarcity as a work stoppage and said he thought it was a manufactured catastrophe.
According to Vasquez, statistics for the county’s two public defense companies indicate that neither is taking on as many cases as the state has stated they can, with some cases being turned down because of workload issues.
Public defense firms have retaliated, claiming that excessive caseloads and inadequate compensation have resulted in a high attorney turnover rate.
Stacey Reding, executive director of Multnomah Defenders Inc., described Vasquez’s remarks as “incredibly disappointing.” It is widely known that there is a scarcity of workers, she continued.
According to public defenders, a high turnover rate results from hiring new employees who are unable to handle all of the cases on the first day of work.
In response, Vasquez said: I’m outraged that they’re not accepting the cases. To offer a service that is essential to our community, they are using our tax funds.
Vasquez went on to say: Despite receiving additional funding, this situation has gotten worse. Unfortunately, given the number of issues we’ve observed in the metro Oregon area, it’s time to just throw money at the problem and hope for better results. After that, things become worse.
This session, Aimee Green is covering the Oregon Legislature. You can contact her at [email protected] or @o_aimee, or 503-294-5119.
Your support is essential to our journalism. Sign up for OregonLive.com now.
Stories by
Aimee Green
-
Avalanche of bills: Oregon lawmakers file record number, spurring concern over bottlenecks
-
Miserably cold renters sue Portland apartment managers for $1.8M, say heating been spotty for years
-
State officials blast Trump for freezing federal funds to Oregon to advance his political agenda
-
Tow truck driver mistook man as homeless person, then brutally beat him in Clackamas County, lawsuit says
-
Oregon job applicant with face tattoo sues for $50K, claiming convenience store refused to hire him
